Monsanto vs. Schmeiser case.
this is the grading rubric:
1. All topics were discussed in clear detail.
2. Author supported assertions correctly.
3. Ideas were inter-related coherently and logically.
4. Author creatively enhances the topic.
5. Addresses Monsanto’s probable reasons related to increased crop production
6. Discusses role of government in approving genetically-engineered crops
7. Explain the role of agribusiness and farmer acceptance
8. Impact of anti-biotech campaigns is addressed
9. States opinion about Monsanto and its operations from a bioethical standpoint
10. States opinion about how Monsanto and Schmeiser case has affected public opinion of Monsanto.
ORGANIZATION (25%)
11. An introduction previews main points of study
12. Body of paper develops and elaborates main ideas.
13. A conclusion summarizes main points.
WRITING MECHANICS and STYLE (25%)
14. Paper free of mechanical errors (e.g., misspellings, typos, etc.)
15.. Paper grammatically sound (proper sentence structure)
16. Citations and references in proper style (e.g., APA).
